April 9, 2012

SCHOENBERG: String Quartet in D minor, Op.7


After years of trying to like Schoenberg's Op.7 string quartet I still perceive it as a mildly irritating exercise in compositional excess.  Its forty five minutes densely packed with feverish thematic development, frenetic piling up of counterpoint, and restless harmonic motion simply refuse to sum up to an aesthetically rewarding experience.  (Despite a committed and technically superb performance by the Borromeo Quartet from a 2011 concert at the Jordan Hall, New England Conservatory, Boston.)
 
I even thought that perhaps "compositional excess" is an uncharitable way to describe what might be a case of compositional despair felt by a composer who wants to keep things fresh and interesting with compositional tools that have been badly worn-out by two centuries of heavy use.  What if Schoenberg's constantly varied asymmetric themes, his restlessly crisscrossing voice leading (with its constant spray of non-harmonic notes), his fluctuating rhythms, his refusal to punctuate his "musical prose" with musically meaningful pauses - what if all this is meant to divert my attention from the fact that the music's inner core consists of essentially triadic harmonies moving in familiar ways along the tonic-dominant axes of D minor and related keys?

If my guess is correct, then perhaps sympathy rather than irritation is an appropriate emotional response to Schoenberg's struggle with tonality -- the kind of sympathy one may feel for the desperate efforts of a long married couple to camouflage the boringly predicable and worn-out anatomical reality of their sex life with romantic getaways, Victoria's Secret underwear, and assorted contraptions delivered in plain wrapped parcels from Babes in Toyland...

7 comments:

laybl said...

I believe that composing music is best compared to architexture. A building design may be seen in terms of function, only, or in terms of its identity. I recall an architect friend (belgian) trying to decribe Johnson's Bell tower on Madison by standing tall with arms pressed against his body and legs stiffly together...somehow, he became the building.

Schoenberg's problem, or yours,may stem from creative fatigue or over-familiarity. Whatever or whichever, it is incumbent on the listener to listen with aural blinders. All too often I find myself recognizing the roots of a painting or drawing instead of finding a tabula rasa newness and judging accordingly. It has been claimed that there are a very finite number of plots in literature. And in music...???

sasha said...

Mmmm Interesting thoughts once more on the music of Schoenberg, Boom..I tend to approach all his pre-atonal works (by which I mean anything roughly pre-1909) with little glee..'Pelleas..', 'Verklate Nacht', 'Gurreleider' etc all sound like a man getting his 'stuff' together (compositionally and expressively speaking) and say little to me..Having said that the present work isn't without its merits.I rather like the halloucegenic, frenzied, fevourish quality of parts of this work..Still that argumentative (slightly hysterical) quality I find in Schoenberg's music is not something I'm drawn to now as much as I used too be..And I guess, to my mind, that is where Schoenberg reveals himself to be as much a child of the late 19th century chromatic thicket (a la Strauss and Wagner) as he ever was a fully fleged emancipated 20th century enfant terrible..To that particular legacy I feel he bequeathed his 'children' (Webern and Berg)..Look forward to hearing this and comparing it the famed La Salle DG reading.

Guillermo said...

I just went back to the Quartet #2 under the (almost always) most satisfying Ardittis. That Litanei does it every time. 'Deep is the sadness that overclouds me, once more I enter Lord! in thy house...Kill ev'ry longing, close my heart's wound, take from me love, and give me my peace!'
I'm always comforted by the swath where you can feel the electromagnet switch being de-energized, and the tonal metals begin to float apart

Now if only I could get a version without Mme. Upshaw...

Yeah, that Quartet 1 gets less attention. So I'm a historical significance whore.

sasha said...

Funny listening again to the late String Trio op.45,which I hold in high regard, after this early quartet..The same confrontational, fevered gesture is at play all those years later.Sure the latter work has a greater breadth and expressive pitch but its still clearly the same composer to my ears..But truth be told those frenzied utterances just don't move me, at the moment, the way they used too..

Boom said...

Sasha,

I wonder if you know the Op.45 recording done by LA Trio, available in a stunning LP transfer of Avant-garde Project?
To me, the music in that performance sounds more anguished than frenzied (as in Op.7), and somehow the textures feel more transparent than in other recordings of that Trio that I've heard...

Boom said...

Blogger Guillermo said...
>> Now if only I could get a version without Mme. Upshaw...<<

Guillermo,

What about the classic recording by Lasalle Quartet (on DG)?

sasha said...

Yes Boom!! The LA Trio in op.45..Absolutely brilliant!!! Thanks for the tip..I'd forgotten bout that recording..Yes I got it from the Avant-Garde Project a while ago..Knocks everyone else out of the ball park..And yes yes the anguish is there but not the frenzy of other readings that I've heard..Listening to it now as I write..Can't think it could be bettered.